<html>
<head>
<title>
A Permanent Party Enabler
</title>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"></head><body>
A Permanent Party Enabler
<p>
Imagine an organization that finds and supports <a href="https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)">Democrats</a> to run for office supported by a million people, the same number of people as who finance the <a href="https://aclu.org/">ACLU</a>.
This million people contributing $10 dollars per month will support
permanent organization that spans elections rather than poofing out of
existence when the candidate's term expires. Imagine replacing the
University physics lab every 4 years. A million people contributing $10 a
month enables a staff 50 at $100,000 and 240 at $10 an hour. Reason is
never never outweighed by a majority vote the same way the Biology lab
doesn't overule the Physics lab. The candidates we put in office as a
group will do exactly what we have determined they should do. The only
difficulty will be the military because our organization cannot receive
state secrets from the military. There can never be direct feedback from
our elected people to our organization if the information is a state
secret.
<p>
<ul>
[secretary]
<p>
|
<p>
[permanent staff that compiles correct logic]
<p>
The secretary, put forward as a Democratic candidate by the staff, does what the staff tell the secretary to do.
</ul>
<p>
Because this organization is permanent, it has to be particularly
careful about being correct to avoid backfire hurting a permanent brand.
We barely lost the White House and Republicans still own the Senate and
the Supreme Court. About 40% of the population makes $15 or less an
hour. We accomplished <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_security">Social Security</a>, a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage_in_the_United_States">Federal Minimum Wage</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Aid_Highway_Act_of_1956">The Highway Act</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicare_(United_States)">Medicare</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicaid">Medicaid</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act">Civil Rights Acts</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBS">PBS</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPR">NPR</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA">NASA</a>, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency">EPA</a>, and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Emergency_Management_Agency">FEMA</a> and other things as <a href="https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)">Democrats</a> but we still need other improvements.
</p><p>
Our current systems of Public Education, Police, Firemen, City
Governance, Roads, and everything else that improves our lives were
enormous struggles. All these long, difficult struggles were all <a href="https://imgur.com/gallery/5SbYAJw">hindered</a> by backfire.
</p><p>
Example of backfire against the Democratic Party:
</p><p>
</p><ul>
1) We should let anyone into this country. Both our Candidates were of
this opinion. Do you expect to be able to stay in Canada forever? Nope.
Smart countries don't want the shithole countries outweighing their
votes for good reason. Why would Canada and the United Kingdom ever
allow their votes to be outweighed by voters in the United States. They
all have health care while our great Democrat "accomplishment" was
forcing people to buy health insurance.
<p>
2) <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctuary_city">Sanctuary City</a>
laws. While it might be noble to try and hide out illegally in a
foreign country to better your descendents situation, the country you
are hiding in should not give you a free pass. (Remember the Trump line?
Shithole Countries exist! Look at Saudi Arabia. It wasn't until 2015
that women were allowed to vote, and the efforts to improve these
backwards countries are all hindered by backfire.)
</p><p>
3) Abolish ICE. Huh? Do we expect other countries to let us past our tourist visa? Of course not.
</p><p>
4) Don't worry about identification at the polls. Let anyone vote.
Should a bank allow people without identification to walk in and
withdraw money without identification? Of course not.
</p><p>
5) Democrats in the media who do entire show segments that are untruthful or sloppy! One example: <a href="https://www.cbs.com/shows/the-late-show-with-stephen-colbert/">Stephen Colbert Show</a> and <a href="http://www.cc.com/shows/the-daily-show-with-trevor-noah">The Daily Show</a> about Melanie Trump's <a href="https://www.apnews.com/cf927d4412604313af8ac0d81b8c540f">graffitied jacket</a>. There is plenty of material their staffs could write about that highlights dumb policy and opinions.
</p><p>
</p></ul>
<p>
Example of backfire against the Republican Party:
</p><p>
</p><ul>
1) Republicans are more likely to be religious and less likely to be
science minded. There is no God! This is a fact! We're not knowledgable
of every fact straight out of the womb and that is ok. Some of us learn
this later in life than others.
<p>
2) Republicans consistently promote cutting taxes. We have to pay for stuff, so we can't cut taxes!
</p><p>
3) Republicans are more likely to be against union forming.
</p></ul>
<p>
The Future:
</p><p>
</p><ul>
<p>
The government will guarantee a job for everyone. Because the government run businesses will be subsidized by taxes for the purpose of guaranteeing its survival, it might eventually take over the entire industry of which it is a member. As long as something useful is created that can be used later, this is fine. So for example the demand for research oriented to greater efficiency and improvement never runs out. There is never idle labor in this model. To avoid international disparities, this should be an international business spanning every democracy of the world.
<p>
Ownership of large businesses will be transferred to we, the people for greater transparency and consolidation of resources.
<p>
With a world agreement we will cap income so rich people cannot escape to other countries. Huge decision points in this income capped model are determined by logic rather than wealth.
<p>
</p></ul></body></html>